Client Impact Series · Telecommunications
Documented, anonymised outcome

Reclaiming procurement-team time at a national telco on Oracle Fusion

A national Malaysian telecommunications provider was spending 42% of procurement-team time on just 28% of spend value. Moving the long tail onto governed catalogues alongside Oracle Fusion freed that capacity and cut costs.

Telecommunications · Peninsular Malaysia · Last updated 11 July 2026 · By Lapasar Procurement Research

RM 11.2M
Total savings over 18 months
42% → 19%
Staff time on long-tail spend
−15.6%
Average unit-cost reduction
490 → 198
Active indirect suppliers

The organisation

A Malaysian enterprise in the telecommunications sector with annual indirect procurement spend exceeding RM 100 million, running Oracle Fusion. A disproportionate share of procurement-team time was consumed by low-value, long-tail purchasing. Identity and industry-specific details are anonymised by agreement; all figures are measured client outcomes.

The challenge

  • 42% of procurement-team time spent on just 28% of spend value — the long tail.
  • 490+ active indirect suppliers across regions with inconsistent terms.
  • Pricing inconsistency: identical items priced 15–31% differently across sites.
  • Bumiputera participation tracked manually every quarter, a slow and error-prone process.

The solution

  • Moved long-tail indirect categories onto a governed marketplace catalogue with standardised pricing.
  • Integrated with the existing Oracle Fusion environment so buyers stayed in familiar workflows.
  • Consolidated duplicate and low-value suppliers through data-led rationalisation.
  • Automated Bumiputera participation tracking, replacing manual quarterly reporting with real-time reporting.

Implementation

18-month programme

  1. Phase 1 · Catalogue & Oracle Fusion

    Long-tail catalogue normalisation and integration with the Oracle Fusion environment so requisitioners kept familiar workflows.

  2. Phase 2 · Supplier rationalisation

    Data-led consolidation of duplicate and low-value suppliers, standardising pricing across sites.

  3. Phase 3 · Compliance automation

    Automated Bumiputera participation tracking and category-level spend analytics for real-time governance.

The results

Measured results for National telecommunications provider
MetricResult
Average unit price−15.6%
Duplicate-supplier cost−RM 2.1M
Spot-buy events−68%
Active indirect suppliers490 → 198
Staff time on long-tail spend42% → 19%
Bumiputera reportingManual quarterly → automated real-time

Savings & outcome

Over 18 months the programme delivered RM 11.2 million in total cost savings, led by a 15.6% average unit-cost reduction, the removal of RM 2.1M in duplicate-supplier cost, and a 68% fall in spot-buy events.

18-month outcome: RM 11.2 million total cost savings, 2,260 staff hours recovered per month, the supplier base rationalised from 490 to 198, a 15.6% average unit-cost reduction, procurement-team time on the long tail cut from 42% to 19%, and Bumiputera tracking moved from manual quarterly to automated real-time reporting.

Frequently asked questions

How much did the telco save with Lapasar?
RM 11.2 million in total cost savings over 18 months, driven by a 15.6% average unit-cost reduction, RM 2.1M less duplicate-supplier cost, and a 68% fall in emergency spot-buys.
Does Lapasar work alongside Oracle Fusion?
Yes. In this implementation the governed marketplace catalogue was integrated with the client's existing Oracle Fusion environment so requisitioners kept their familiar workflows while long-tail spend moved on-contract.
How was Bumiputera reporting handled?
Bumiputera participation tracking moved from a manual quarterly process to automated real-time reporting, removing a slow and error-prone task for the procurement team.

Explore related across the knowledge graph

Case studyNational energy utilityA multi-site Malaysian energy utility moved fragmented long-tail spend onto governed catalogues and native SAP S/4HANA punchout — RM 8.4M saved in year one.ResearchMalaysia Procurement Statistics 2026A citable compendium of Malaysia's key procurement benchmarks for 2026 — spend structure, tail spend, supplier fragmentation, digital adoption and savings.ResearchMalaysian Tail-Spend Benchmark 2026Benchmark the long tail: its share of spend, transactions and suppliers in Malaysian enterprises, order economics, and the savings consolidation unlocks.GlossaryProcurement DashboardA procurement dashboard is a visual display that brings together key procurement metrics — spend, savings, supplier performance and cycle times — in one real-time view.GuideProcurement KPIsThe measures that show whether procurement is delivering cost, speed, compliance and supplier value — and where to focus next.GuideSupplier scorecardsHow to measure supplier performance over time with a weighted scorecard — turning quality, delivery, price and service into evidence you can act on.SolutionGLC & Government Procurement in MalaysiaDigital procurement for Malaysian GLCs — catalogue, approval governance, Bumiputera vendor reporting and audit-ready compliance, backed by owned fulfilment.SolutionNetSuite PunchOut Integration in MalaysiaConnect NetSuite procurement to the Lapasar B2B marketplace via punchout — requisition live catalogue items at contract pricing inside NetSuite.SolutionTail-Spend Management in MalaysiaBring tail spend under control — consolidate long-tail purchases onto one managed B2B marketplace with contract pricing, spend analytics and ERP punchout.ToolFree Procurement Tools & TemplatesEvery Lapasar procurement calculator plus editable RFQ, purchase order, policy and evaluation templates.ToolSupplier Consolidation CalculatorModel the savings from rationalising a fragmented supplier base.TemplateSupplier Scorecard TemplateAn Excel scorecard to track a supplier's ongoing performance on weighted KPIs, with an automatic rating.ResearchEnterprise Procurement Report 2026How Malaysia's largest enterprises and GLCs run procurement in 2026 — the maturity curve, spend under management, and what leaders do differently.Case studyCorporate office & pantry programme (illustrative)A representative model of a corporate services team consolidating office and pantry supply across multiple sites onto one governed catalogue with predictable delivery.Case studyMulti-site manufacturer (illustrative)A representative model — grounded in published benchmarks — of a multi-site manufacturer consolidating MRO and indirect spend across plants onto governed catalogues.

This case study is anonymised by agreement with the client. All figures are based on actual measured client outcomes; client identity and industry-specific details have been withheld.

See what Lapasar could do for your procurement

Talk to our team about taking your long-tail spend on-contract — wholesale pricing, ERP punchout, credit terms and delivery across Peninsular Malaysia.

Prefer to talk to a real person?

Our team replies fast on WhatsApp and email — no forms, no waiting.